The Political Economy of Logistics Capitalism: Algorithmic Circulation, Maritime Chokepoints, and the Spatial Fix of Global Supply Chains
Keywords:
Logistics Capitalism, Supply Chains, Maritime Chokepoints, Time-Space Compression, Digital Taylorism, Geopolitics, Containerization, Degrowth, Political EconomyAbstract
The continuous, frictionless circulation of commodities has become the absolute precondition for the survival of contemporary global capitalism. This comprehensive paper investigates the political economy of "logistics capitalism," arguing that the logistical sector has transcended its historical role as a mere supportive mechanism for manufacturing, evolving into an independent, central axis of capital accumulation and structural power. By tracing the historical evolution from mid-20th-century containerization to contemporary algorithmic supply chain management, we map how transnational shipping cartels and e-commerce monopolies have captured the global architecture of circulation. We utilize a Marxist framework to demonstrate how capital seeks to annihilate space through time, continuously compressing the turnover time of capital to maximize the realization of surplus value. This study provides an exhaustive empirical analysis of maritime chokepoints—including the Suez Canal, the Strait of Malacca, and the Panama Canal—illustrating how these critical geographic nodes represent acute systemic vulnerabilities that are increasingly weaponized in geopolitical conflicts. Furthermore, we dissect the labor process within the logistical chain, documenting how the hyper-exploitation of seafarers, port workers, and warehouse staff is enforced through regimes of digital Taylorism and jurisdictional arbitrage. The paper critiques the ecological devastation inherent in maintaining elongated global supply lines, subsidized by unregulated maritime emissions and the externalization of environmental costs. We evaluate the emerging era of "de-risking" and near-shoring as state-led attempts to secure logistical sovereignty amidst a fracturing geopolitical order. Ultimately, this paper concludes that mitigating the systemic fragility and ecological violence of logistics capitalism requires a radical transition toward degrowth, the localization of production networks, and the democratic socialization of global transit infrastructure.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Reading in Political Economy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
